ScienQ Pulishers is an Open Access Publishers publishes original research work in all major disciplines of basic and clinical medical sciences, Engineering and Technology ,Applied Sciences, Life Sciences, Environmental sciences and . Invited and submitted review articles on current topics will also be included. Doctors & Scholars are encouraged to contribute interesting Articles.
We ask all journal editors to make every reasonable effort to adhere to the following ethical guidelines for ScieniQ Publishers journal articles that seem worthy of peer review.
Introduction: The introduction should set the tone of the paper by providing a clear statement of the study, the relevant literature on the study subject and the proposed approach or solution. The introduction should be general enough to attract a reader’s attention from a broad range of scientific disciplines.
Choosing Reviewers: Editors should ensure that appropriate reviewers are selected for submissions (i.e. individuals who are able to judge the work and are free from disqualifying competing interests). Editors should ideally choose at least two reviewers to provide a report (the default on Manuscript Central is set to three).
Editors should cease to use reviewers who consistently produce discourteous, poor quality or late reviews. Editors should use a wide range of sources (not just personal contacts) to identify potential new reviewers (e.g. author suggestions, bibliographic databases).
Review Process: Journal editors should give unbiased consideration to each manuscript submitted for consideration for publication, and should judge each on its merits, without regard to race, religion, nationality, sex, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the author(s).
Editors should be ready to justify any important deviation from the described peer review process. Editors should require reviewers to disclose any potential competing interests before agreeing to review a submission.
Journal editors must keep the peer review process confidential; information or correspondence about a manuscript should not be shared with anyone outside of the peer review process.
Journal editors should make all reasonable effort to process submitted manuscripts in an efficient and timely manner.
Editors should monitor the performance of peer reviewers and take steps to ensure this is of high standard. Editors should encourage reviewers to comment on
Acknowledgments: This section includes acknowledgment of people, grant details, funds, etc.
Tables: The tables must be included in the text file after the references section of the manuscript. Conditions for table preparation
Galley proofs: Unless indicated otherwise, galley proofs will be sent to the first-named author and should be returned within 48 hours of receipt.
Fee Policy: Once an article has been accepted for publication, any Article Processing Charges become due towards the time and resources utilized in processing the article. The submitting author assumes responsibility for the Article Processing Charges and also once a payment is processed, the journal will not issue refunds of any kind.
Abstract: The abstract should not exceed 300 words. It should be written in complete sentences and should give factual information.
Article Processing Charges: ScieniQ Publishers follows the Open Access Policy of publication, which does not charge the readers to access the content. This allows the readers to view, access, download and distribute the content without any limits, provided the original work is cited, under the term of “Creative Commons Attribution License”. The cost of the maintenance of journal will be recovered from authors for their published articles. We provide fast and affordable publication services. There are no submission chargers.The publishing fee is 900$.
Complaints & Miscounduct: Misconduct and unethical behaviour may be identified and brought to the attention of the editor and publisher at any time, by anyone.
Whoever informs the editor or publisher of such conduct must provide all the information needed for the investigation to be initiated. All allegations should be taken seriously and treated in the same way, until a successful decision or conclusion is reached.
Editorial board members must guarantee prompt responses to the complainants by taking action and correcting the signalled errors.
An initial decision should be taken by the editor, who should consult with or seek advice from the publisher, if appropriate.
Evidence should be gathered, while avoiding spreading any allegations beyond those who need to know.